Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:32

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Caitlin Clark's Teammate Sends Official 'Warning' To WNBA Referees - Yahoo Sports
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
CM Punk makes John Cena’s WWE title reign interesting by delivering the Truth - Cageside Seats
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Galaxy Watch 8 series leak shows Samsung’s upcoming wearables from every angle - 9to5Google
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Google Play Store replaces ‘1-tap buy’ with ‘Slide to buy’ - 9to5Google
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
From 1 to 10, how dark is the Naruto fandom? Why?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Psychopathic individuals recognize unfairness but are less likely to punish it - PsyPost
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
How can the K-pop fandom have such a toxic mentality?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.